Quality and validation · Tutorial 14 of 41

HTMT / HTMT+

Are the five customer-experience constructs empirically distinct?

Supported in 2.62.8

Purpose and applicability

Are the five customer-experience constructs empirically distinct?

Prerequisites

  • Use an eligible multi-item reflective measurement model

Do not use it merely because it is available

Use HTMT / HTMT+ only when its estimand, data roles and assumptions answer the stated research question. Choose a related estimator or diagnostic when the intended outcome is not among the documented outputs below.

Study preparation

Teaching data
customer-experience-pls.csv
Observations
400
Study type
Deterministic synthetic teaching study
Calculate route
Calculate → PLS-SEM Algorithm → Results → HTMT+ and HTMT — original signed correlations

Open the data dictionary and variable-role reference

Model

Quality (quality_1–quality_4), Value (value_1–value_3), Trust (trust_1–trust_4), Satisfaction (satisfaction_1–satisfaction_4), and Loyalty (loyalty_1–loyalty_4), all reflective

Quality, Value, and Trust → Satisfaction; Quality, Value, and Trust → Loyalty. This direct-effects teaching model deliberately leaves indirect-path analysis to the separate Mediation tutorial

Exact workflow

  1. Download customer-experience-pls.csv and the prepared customer-experience-pls.qpls project. Keep both files in a writable study folder.

  2. Start QuickPLS, choose Open Project, and open the prepared project. Its saved model is already arranged and fitted.

  3. Open Data and confirm that the study contains 400 observations. Return to the model or calculation workspace.

  4. Confirm the saved model specification: Quality (quality_1–quality_4), Value (value_1–value_3), Trust (trust_1–trust_4), Satisfaction (satisfaction_1–satisfaction_4), and Loyalty (loyalty_1–loyalty_4), all reflective. Structural specification: Quality, Value, and Trust → Satisfaction; Quality, Value, and Trust → Loyalty. This direct-effects teaching model deliberately leaves indirect-path analysis to the separate Mediation tutorial.

  5. Confirm that construct labels, indicators, and arrows are readable. The supplied project is saved after Arrange and Fit; do not rearrange it before the tutorial run.

  6. Choose Calculate, then use Calculate → PLS-SEM Algorithm → Results → HTMT+ and HTMT — original signed correlations.

  7. Review the essential settings listed below. Open Advanced settings only when the design requires a non-default option.

  8. Resolve actionable blockers, review applicability warnings, and leave Open Results when finished selected.

  9. Choose Start calculation. Wait for Completed, then confirm that Results opens for this method.

  10. Inspect the named outputs below in order. Use Save Report, table Copy, or Export as required, then save and reopen the project to confirm the result remains available.

Essential and advanced settings

  • Use the ordinary PLS point-estimate settings; the qualified PLS result contains both HTMT point matrices

Keep other advanced controls at their documented defaults unless the study design requires a justified change. Record every non-default value in the research log.

Results to inspect

  1. HTMT+ matrix
  2. Original signed HTMT matrix
  3. Heatmaps

Interpretation guidance

For HTMT / HTMT+, interpret the listed outputs together with the prerequisite result, the selected settings, model assumptions and data quality. The supplied values are instructional; they are not validation against an external paper or another software package.

Method notes
  • Formative and single-indicator pairs are not applicable and appear as N/A.
  • The 2.62.8 tutorial verifies point matrices in the qualified PLS result and does not claim successful standalone HTMT bootstrap-result publication.

Reporting guidance

Report the QuickPLS version, HTMT / HTMT+ route, sample size, model or variable roles, preprocessing, essential settings, non-default advanced settings, and the named primary outputs. Retain the project, data checksum and exported table used in the manuscript.

Common mistakes and recovery

  • Running the method before completing its prerequisite calculation.
  • Changing the data, model or variable roles after the prerequisite result was saved.
  • Treating an unavailable or not-applicable value as zero.
  • Reporting an estimate without its method-appropriate uncertainty or diagnostic context.

Open calculation and Results troubleshooting

Screen-by-screen evidence

Images shown here are mapped to this tutorial’s required installed-application evidence. Missing captures are labelled explicitly and are not replaced with generic screenshots.

Step 1: Imported teaching dataset is open
Step 3: The prepared project opens with its saved, neatly arranged model diagram
Step 6: Correct method and required settings are visible
Step 9: Primary HTMT / HTMT+ result is visible
Step 9: Second important HTMT / HTMT+ result is visible

Limitations and related methods

This tutorial verifies the documented workflow and outputs for its supplied teaching fixture. It does not establish numerical identity with another package, replace method literature, or guarantee that the method is suitable for a different study.

Related methods in this family